Entrevista «¿Qué es el odio y por qué está cerca de nosotros?», Longitud de Onda, Radio Clásica, RTVE

Entrevista «¿Qué es el odio y por qué está cerca de nosotros?, a partir del minuto 15′, en el programa Longitud de Onda, Radio Clásica de RTVE

¿Qué es el odio y por qué está cerca de nosotros?

“¿Qué es el odio? ¿Por qué está cerca de nosotros” Artículo en The Conversation

“¿Qué es el odio? ¿Por qué está cerca de nosotros” , artículo en The Conversation

El lenguaje del odio ocupa mucho espacio en los medios, pero se dedica poca atención al concepto de odio…

https://theconversation.com/que-es-el-odio-por-que-esta-cerca-de-nosotros-149255

Oscar Pérez de la Fuente. La Filosofía es necesaria

Oscar Pérez de la Fuente. La Filosofía es necesaria2 days ago

Nuevo post📑 "Franklin Roosevelt, adversidad y crecimiento", 🦉Estrategia Minerva Blog

#Optimismo #Todosomosminoria #lealtad #criticaconstruvtiva #Estadosocial

👇

https://webphilosophia.com/estrategia/franklin-roosevelt-adversidad-y-crecimiento/

Ver en Facebook

Oscar Pérez de la Fuente. La Filosofía es necesaria4 days ago

New review📖: Carbajal-Camberos, J. P. (2025), Przegląd Politologiczny 🇵🇱, (3), 313–315. https://doi.org/10.14746/pp.2025.30.3.21

Reviewed book 📗: Pérez de la Fuente, Oscar, Skrzypczak, Jędrzej (eds.), 📀Bridging the Digital Divide: Perspectives on Inequality and Discrimination in the Digital Age, Palgrave MacMillan, Cham, 2025, 187 pp. ISBN 303183478X

👇

https://webphilosophia.com/blog/review-juan-pablo-carabajal-bridging-the-digital-divide-przeglad-politologiczny/

Ver en Facebook

Oscar Pérez de la Fuente. La Filosofía es necesaria5 days ago

📢Sesión Seminario 🌎 Pluralismo cultural y minorías: “La protección de las minorías en el Consejo de Europa: Avances y desarrollos”, por Elwna Dáiz Galán, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos jueves 📆 15 de enero 2026 🕠 14:00h 🖥️ presencial en el aula Aula 18.0.A03 y online @idhbc_uc3m

Más información 👉 http://pluralismocultural.webphilosophia.com

Ver en Facebook

Oscar Pérez de la Fuente. La Filosofía es necesaria4 weeks ago

New post 📑"Diego de Saavedra Fajardo, Political enterprises", 🦉Minerva Strategy Blog

#goodmanners #educationfordemocracy #sectarism

👇

https://minervastrategy.webphilosophia.com/?p=372

Ver en Facebook

Oscar Pérez de la Fuente. La Filosofía es necesaria1 month ago

📣Call for papers 📑 Special Workshop “Democracy, free speech, disinformation and digital literacy”, 🏛️IVR World Congress of the Association of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, Istanbul 🇹🇷, 📆28 June-3 July 2026

Democracy rests on a single, fragile premise: citizens can access reliable information, debate it freely, and then make reasoned choices. Free speech is therefore not a decorative luxury; it is the circulatory system of self-government. Without it, voters become disconnected from reality, and power flows to whoever controls the loudest megaphone.

Yet the digital age has broken the old filters that once separated signal from noise. In the pre-internet era, professional gatekeepers—editors, broadcasters, and fact-checkers—were imperfect, often biased, and sometimes captured by vested interests, but they operated under legal accountability, reputation costs, and shared norms. Today, any individual or state actor can reach millions instantly, anonymously, and at almost zero marginal cost. The result is an information environment in which deliberate disinformation spreads faster than truth because it is engineered to do so: emotionally charged, identity-affirming, and algorithmically boosted.

This is not an argument for censorship. State or corporate control of speech is the historic fast track to tyranny; the cure is almost always worse than the disease. The 20th century is littered with regimes that promised to “protect democracy” by silencing dissent and ended up destroying both. Once governments or unaccountable tech platforms are granted the power to decide what counts as “disinformation”, that power will inevitably be turned against political minorities, whistle-blowers, and legitimate controversy.

The only sustainable answer is mass digital literacy—taught early, reinforced often, and treated as a core civic duty comparable to jury service or voting itself. Citizens must learn to recognise motivated reasoning in themselves and others, to check primary sources, to distinguish between disagreeable opinion and verifiable falsehood, and to demand transparency from both platforms and officials. Schools that graduate functionally illiterate readers of charts, statistics, and metadata are failing democracy as surely as if they stopped teaching history.

Ultimately, democracy in the digital age will survive not because we found the perfect referee, but because enough citizens refuse to be passive consumers of weaponised narratives. Instead of this, they need to develop skills and habits to learn how to interpret the complexity of today’s world.

More information 👇

https://webphilosophia.com/blog/ivr-special-workshop-democracy-free-speech-disinformation-and-digital-literacy-istanbul-28-june-3-june-2026/

11Ver en Facebook